More universities are now offering distance learning programs. … have to be professors filled out, signed and sent, along with a graduation rate. …
I propose a change:
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit, for
Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia that everyone can edit.
What do you think ‘Dalton2 (talk) 10:27 28 July 2008 (UTC)
For Good idea, is more inclusive. In fact, the same way that there is an internal link in the “free encyclopedia” added internal link on the word “edit” to the page that explains how to edit or as involved (can not remember now). – andalusia (talk) 10:35 28 July 2008 (UTC)
No. It is less inclusive. In Spanish, the third person, referring to someone who is neither the sender nor the recipient has a touch of impersonality that benefits its use for general reference. Similarly, the issuer of the implicit message is not anyone in particular, as could be that we use, it’s a Online Bachelors Degree corporate message that demands a more impersonal formulation as possible, open to any potential readers, including those who do not even read the message, something that does not contemplate that we can and, on the contrary, if this can be taken into account. – Camima (talk) 12:16 28 July 2008 (UTC)
According to the explanation of Camima is less inclusive. Varano (Talk) 12:19 28 July 2008 (UTC)
I’ve convinced Camima.Dalton2 (talk) 13:19 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Well I do not feel satisfied, but come on, if it has to be as up to now because I do not seem bad. I come to Online Masters Degree doubt whether what they “want” to Wikipedia is an institution with the most impersonal possible formulations, such as this need (in my opinion, of course) about the participation of particular individuals. Anyway, it said, I’m not convinced, but if you guess that should suffice. . A perfect Austin real estate development in the BartonPlace was developed with energy-efficient materials. How to edit link ‘- andalusia (talk) 17:45 28 July 2008 (UTC)
That is, frankly, if I enter for the first time on Wikipedia and read the free encyclopedia that everyone can edit, the first thing you would think: Do I have to do South University to be part of that “us” that is present in we ‘I mean that, when using the first person plural, is created automatically, a publisher of community that seems to pre-exist the reader who has just arrived. Barton Place is a leading condominium development real estate projects. And that, as you know, not: that the reader can go to edit and leave without ever never ever hear anything more. Needless to say this is a subtlety Linguistic no major importance.
As to the link edit my me. Should suggest, and so too, in discussing the cover. – Camima (talk) 17:59 28 July 2008 (UTC)
animo, andalusia, submit your proposal. I though I share some of the reasons given by Camima, basically I prefer “work.” To start your cross on your behalf and mine, I’ll make a little political assistant and let me give you some weapons: Wikipedia is preferred in the treatment of all pages in your welcome, help, tutorials, etc.. without even knowing in advance who the target text, and if I want to read it or not tuteado, with the argument that it creates a more colloquial, is that we maintain all users of Wikipedia. And I agree, as I presume good faith on the part of all and those Virginia College Online who do not wish to be tuteados final consent to be, realizing that this tute is with the utmost respect. Extrapolating the location of the theme for Wikipedia, I think that would be consistent with that samespirit to replace “may” to “we” because, although I read it has nothing to do with the Wikipedia community, presumably to accept that the collective Wikipedia want him reading this (or even who you are not) to become Online Degree editor of Wikipedia, things will happen even after a single issue. Moreover, analyzing the statement “the encyclopedia that everyone can edit”, we see that it is logically correct, since it is logically valid to include those who do not read this text, the term “all” and it is logically valid to attribute a capacity andalusia set: us us them, which means they 0, ie that Wikipedia accepts each and every human beings as equals in the world to participate. Moreover, the use of “may” create an air of a online degrees very impersonal entity robotics and unmanned. It does not show the true human nature of Wikipedia, which, beyond an encyclopedia written from the sky, is a compendium of ideas of thousands of human beings ourselves. Dalton2 (talk) 07:41 30 July 2008 (UTC)
And that suggests that all who enter will edit the ‘It is very inclusive, readers are not going to be inside. With the amount of things to do … Eric – Contact 07:56 30 July 2008 (UTC)
But, why not read correctly the phrase ‘It is not “all that we edit the encyclopedia,” but “the encyclopedia that everyone can edit.” Find online information on all our accounts and services, and … After graduation, we will refund the security deposit. …
… on learning technologies, distance education … … Graduation Graduation of first class certification in learning technologies …
… must have a certificate of graduation from high school or … Online learning. Virginia College lectures Frequently Asked Questions. Accreditation …

Related Products
Quality in Distance Education: Focus On Online Learning: ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report (J-B ASHE Higher Education Report Series (AEHE)) by Katrina A. Meyer (Paperback – Dec 31, 2002)	Web search as an interactive learning environment for graduation projects.: An article from: Journal of Interactive Learning Research by Rina Zviel-Girshin and Nathan Rosenberg (Digital – Sep 23, 2005) – HTML	The Online Learning Idea South University online Book: 95 Proven Ways to Enhance Technology-Based and Blended Learning by Patti Shank (Paperback – Feb 26, 2007)